Table of Contents
- What is UX research?
- Why should we all care about UX research?
- Two types of UX research
- 1. Qualitative research
- 🔻 User interviews: The OG research method
- 🔻 Focus groups: Group therapy for products
- 🔻 Contextual inquiry: Becoming a user stalker (legally)
- 🔻 Diary studies: The long game
- 🔻 Usability testing: Watching users struggle (for science)
- 2. Quantitative research
- 🔻 Surveys: Asking the right questions to the right people
- 🔻 Analytics: Your silent user observer
- 🔻 A/B testing: The ultimate tie-breaker
- 🔻 Heatmaps: The user attention map
- 🔻 Card sorting: Organizing chaos
- Advanced UX research techniques
- 🔺 Ethnographic studies
- 🔺 Eye-tracking studies
- 🔺 Remote usability testing
- 🔺 Participatory design
- Best practices and tips
- 1. Triangulate data
- 2. Make research a habit
- 3. Collaborate with stakeholders
- 4. Be ethical
- 5. Stay open-minded
- Tools for UX research
- 5. Usability testing
- The future of UX research
- 1. AI and machine learning
- 2. Augmented and virtual reality
- 3. Inclusive design research
- 4. Remote and unmoderated testing
- Research your way to better design decisions
Do not index
Do not index
Read time: under 12 minutes
What is UX research?
UX research is the process of talking to real people to figure out what they actually need, want, and struggle with, instead of guessing based on what you think they need.
What UX research involves:
- Identifying pain points: Where do users get frustrated or confused
- Validating design decisions: Testing whether your solutions actually work
- Measuring success: Tracking whether changes improve the user experience
- Understanding user behaviors: What do people actually do (not what they say they do)
Three core principles of UX research:
- User-centered focus: It's about them, not you or your brilliant ideas
- Evidence-based insights: Decisions backed by data, not opinions
- Actionable outcomes: Research that leads to better design decisions
👉 The step-by-step guide on how to conduct a UX research for beginners:
Why should we all care about UX research?
UX research isn't about proving you're right. It's about discovering when you're wrong, before your users do it for you.
Think of research as your design insurance policy. You wouldn't drive without car insurance, right? Same logic applies here.
Three harsh realities research prevents:
- Assumption armageddon: That feature you're sure users will love, they might hate it.
- The feature cemetery: Building things nobody asked for (RIP to countless unused features)
- The usability black hole: Creating interfaces that confuse more than they help
Research doesn't kill creativity, it channels it toward solutions that actually matter.
👉 The Role of UX Research in the Design Process
Two types of UX research
UX research splits into two camps: qualitative (the "why" behind user behavior) and quantitative (the "what" in measurable terms). Most successful projects use both. Here's your breakdown:
1. Qualitative research
🔻 User interviews: The OG research method
One-on-one conversations that reveal what users actually think (not what they say they think). This method uncovers rich insights into user motivations and frustrations.
When to use:
- Early discovery phase
- Understanding pain points
- Exploring new feature concepts
Key tactics:
- Ask "How do you currently..." instead of "Would you..."
- Follow up "that's interesting" with "tell me more"
- Embrace awkward silences, they often lead to gold
⚠️ Watch out for: Leading questions that push users toward the answer you want to hear.
Pro tip: Record sessions (with permission) and create highlight reels for stakeholders. Nothing beats actual user voices saying "this is confusing."
🔻 Focus groups: Group therapy for products
Moderated group discussions that reveal collective opinions and social dynamics.
Best for:
- Exploring reactions to concepts
- Understanding group consensus
- Generating ideas through discussion
⚠️ Reality check: People lie more in groups. Use this for broad directional feedback, not detailed usability insights.
Pro tip: Mix personality types in your groups. All introverts = crickets. All extroverts = chaos.
🔻 Contextual inquiry: Becoming a user stalker (legally)
Observing users in their natural habitat while they work with your product. It’s like being a detective in the real world, discovering unspoken truths.
Why it's powerful:
- Reveals workarounds users create
- Shows environmental factors affecting usage
- Uncovers the gap between what users say and do
Pro tip: Bring a notebook and sketch the user's environment. Physical constraints often explain digital frustrations.
👉 How To Run Contextual Inquiries:
🔻 Diary studies: The long game
Users document their interactions over days or weeks, revealing patterns you'd miss in one-off sessions.
Perfect for:
- Capturing edge cases
- Studying habits and routines
- Understanding behavior changes over time
Pro tip: Expect 30-50% dropout rates. Plan accordingly and offer incentives.
🔻 Usability testing: Watching users struggle (for science)
Observing users attempt tasks while thinking aloud. This can reveal surprising obstacles or misunderstandings about product functionalities.
Golden rules:
- Don't help when they're struggling
- Test with 5 users to catch 85% of issues
- Ask "what are you thinking?" not "what would you do?"
Pro tip: Create a "struggle bank", video clips of users fighting with your interface. It's persuasive stakeholder ammunition.
👉 How To Usability Test:
2. Quantitative research
🔻 Surveys: Asking the right questions to the right people
Structured questionnaires that gather data at scale.
Carefully craft your questions to avoid bias and consider using Likert scales to measure user satisfaction and preferences.
Survey best practices:
- Use rating scales consistently
- Test your survey on colleagues first
- Keep it under 10 questions for mobile users
Pro tip: Offer a "prefer not to answer" option for sensitive questions. It improves data quality.
🔻 Analytics: Your silent user observer
Digital tracking that reveals what users actually do (versus what they say they do).
Set up custom events and goals in your analytics platform to track specific user actions, such as clicks, form submissions, or purchases.
Essential metrics to track:
- Time on task
- Drop-off points
- Task completion rates
- Error rates and recovery
Pro tip: Analytics tell you what's happening, not why. Pair with qualitative research for the full story.
🔻 A/B testing: The ultimate tie-breaker
Comparing two versions to see which performs better. Helps in making data-driven design decisions.
A/B testing golden rules:
- Test one variable at a time
- Have a hypothesis before you start
- Run tests long enough for statistical significance
Pro tip: Start with high-impact, low-effort tests. Button colors and headline changes can yield quick wins.
🔻 Heatmaps: The user attention map
Visual representations showing where users click, scroll, and hover. Great for identifying user focus areas and navigation issues.
What heatmaps reveal:
- Reading patterns
- Ignored content areas
- False affordances (things that look clickable but aren't)
Pro tip: Combine heatmaps with session recordings for context. A click might indicate interest or confusion.
🔻 Card sorting: Organizing chaos
Users categorize information in ways that make sense to them. Card sorting helps in understanding how users classify and perceive information architecture.
Two flavors:
- Open sorting: Users create their own categories
- Closed sorting: Users organize into predefined buckets
Pro tip: Run open card sorting first to understand mental models, then closed sorting to validate your information architecture.
This framework is part of UX Playbook. Get shortcuts to a master of UX processes, for any projects, without expensive bootcamps.
Advanced UX research techniques
Ready to go beyond basic user interviews? These advanced methods can uncover insights that surface-level research misses.
But fair warning: they're more complex, expensive, and time-consuming. Use them when the stakes justify the investment.
🔺 Ethnographic studies
Think of ethnographic research as a way of becoming a professional user stalker, but in the most respectful, scientific way possible.
What it actually involves:
- Uncovering workarounds and hidden user needs
- Spending days or weeks observing users in their natural habitat
- Understanding cultural and environmental factors that influence behavior
When it's worth the hassle:
- B2B products with complex, multi-step workflows
- When context matters more than individual preferences
- Products used in specialized environments (hospitals, factories, etc.)
⚠️ Reality check: This is expensive and time-intensive. Budget 2-4 weeks minimum and expect significant logistical challenges. Make sure you have a specific hypothesis about environmental factors before committing.
Pro tip: Bring a camera (with permission) to capture the physical workspace. Context photos are incredibly powerful for stakeholder presentations.
🔺 Eye-tracking studies
Eye-tracking is the technology that tracks exactly where users look, how long they stare, and what they completely ignore.
What eye-tracking reveals:
- What content gets completely ignored
- How visual hierarchy actually works in practice
- Where attention goes first (spoiler: usually not where you think)
Best use cases:
- Landing page optimization
- Advertisement placement and design
- E-commerce product pages and checkout flows
- Information-heavy interfaces (dashboards, data viz)
The setup:
- Requires specialized hardware or software
- Participants wear sensors or use webcam-based tracking
- Works best in controlled environments
⚠️ Critical limitation: Eye movement ≠ comprehension. People can stare at something and still not understand it. Always combine with think-aloud protocols.
Pro tip: Eye-tracking works great for A/B testing visual designs. Numbers don't lie about what draws attention.
🔺 Remote usability testing
Users complete tasks on their own time using specialized platforms. No calendars, no time zones, no awkward small talk.
Why it's powerful:
- Test with 50+ users instead of 5-8
- Faster turnaround, results in days, not weeks
- Less observer bias since you're not breathing down their neck
- Users work in their natural environment (their messy desk, their slow wifi)
What you lose:
- Can't clarify confusing instructions
- No ability to ask "why did you do that?" in real-time
- Higher dropout rates (expect 20-30% no-shows)
🎯 Actionable setup:
- Write crystal-clear task instructions (test them internally first)
- Include screening questions to filter quality participants
- Set up automatic follow-up surveys for additional context
Pro tip: Use unmoderated testing for breadth, then follow up with moderated sessions for depth on confusing results.
🔺 Participatory design
In participatory design, users become co-designers, actively involved in the design process.
How it works:
- Design sprint workshops with users as participants
- Collaborative sketching and ideation sessions
- Co-creation of user journey maps and personas
When participatory design shines:
- Building stakeholder buy-in through involvement
- When users have domain expertise you don't possess
- Products for highly specialized user groups (doctors, engineers, etc.)
- Complex problem spaces where you're genuinely unsure of the solution
Workshop structure that works:
- Problem framing (30 minutes): Everyone agrees on what you're solving
- Individual ideation (20 minutes): Silent sketching prevents groupthink
- Share and build (40 minutes): Present ideas and iterate together
- Prioritize (20 minutes): Vote on most promising directions
🎯 Actionable materials list:
- Dot stickers for voting
- Sticky notes (lots of them)
- Large paper or whiteboards
- Timer for keeping energy high
- Thick markers (forces simple ideas)
⚠️ Manage expectations: Users aren't trained designers. Focus on problem-solving, not pixel-perfect mockups.
Pro tip: Give everyone the same materials and time limits. It levels the playing field and prevents one person from dominating the session.
Best practices and tips
1. Triangulate data
Use multiple methods to validate findings.
If users complain about feature X in interviews AND analytics show high drop-off rates there, you've got convergent evidence.
Pro tip: When qualitative and quantitative data conflict, dig deeper. The contradiction often reveals something important.
2. Make research a habit
Integrate research throughout your process:
- Discovery: Understand the problem space
- Ideation: Test concepts and assumptions
- Design: Validate usability and comprehension
- Post-launch: Measure success and identify improvements
Pro tip: Dedicate 10-15% of project time to research. It's an investment, not a cost.
3. Collaborate with stakeholders
Involve stakeholders early in research planning and observation.
Why this works:
- They help interpret findings
- They see user struggles firsthand
- They're more likely to act on insights they helped discover
Pro tip: Invite stakeholders to observe usability sessions. Watching users struggle is more persuasive than any report.
4. Be ethical
Here are some things you need to do:
- Protect participant privacy
- Offer fair compensation for time
- Get informed consent for recordings
- Be transparent about how data will be used
Pro tip: Treat your participants like collaborators, not data points. Respect builds trust, and trust leads to better insights.
Always ask yourself: Would I feel comfortable if I were on the other side of this study?
5. Stay open-minded
Be prepared to challenge your assumptions and let the data guide your decisions.
The things you're most certain about are often wrong. Actively look for evidence that contradicts your beliefs.
Pro tip: Keep an "assumptions journal." Write down what you believe before research, then compare afterward.
This framework is part of UX Playbook. Get shortcuts to a master of UX processes, for any projects, without expensive bootcamps.
Tools for UX research
1. User interviews
- Zoom or Lookback.io: Remote interviews with screen sharing
- Dovetail: Organizing and analyzing qualitative data
- Calendly: Simplified scheduling that reduces no-shows
2. Surveys
- Typeform: User-friendly, mobile-optimized surveys
- Google Forms: Free and functional for basic needs
- Qualtrics: Advanced logic and enterprise features
3. Analytics
- Google Analytics: Free and comprehensive for web
- Mixpanel: Event-based tracking for apps
- Hotjar: Heatmaps and session recordings in one platform
4. Card sorting
- Optimal Workshop: Comprehensive card sorting and tree testing
- UserZoom: Full research platform including card sorting
5. Usability testing
- UserTesting: Large participant pool and quick turnaround
- Maze: Unmoderated testing with quantitative metrics
- UsabilityHub: First-click tests and preference testing
👉 Usability Testing Tools Every UX Designer Should Know
The future of UX research
1. AI and machine learning
AI and machine learning are turning research from manual slog into intelligent analysis.
What AI actually does well:
- Transcribes interviews faster than your intern
- Spots patterns in massive datasets you'd miss
- Identifies sentiment in thousands of user comments
- Automatically tags and categorizes qualitative feedback
What AI still sucks at:
- Understanding context and nuance
- Making strategic recommendations
- Reading between the lines of human emotion
⚠️ Reality check: AI won't replace researchers, but researchers who use AI will replace those who don't.
2. Augmented and virtual reality
As AR and VR become mainstream, we're learning how users behave in 3D spaces, and it's nothing like flat screens.
What's different in immersive research:
- Motion sickness affects usability (seriously)
- Users navigate with their whole body, not just fingers
- Spatial memory works differently than visual memory
- Social presence changes behavior in unexpected ways
New research challenges:
- What's the equivalent of "click here" in 3D space?
- How do you observe someone in VR without being creepy?
- How do accessibility guidelines apply to virtual environments?
3. Inclusive design research
Inclusive design research isn't just politically correct, it's better business. Period.
What's changing:
- Cultural competency becomes a research skill
- Accessibility isn't optional anymore (thanks, lawsuits)
- Diverse participant recruitment becomes standard practice
- Assistive technology testing moves from afterthought to core requirement
Why this matters beyond compliance:
- Diverse perspectives prevent groupthink
- Edge cases often reveal universal problems
- Accessible design benefits everyone (curb cuts, anyone?)
4. Remote and unmoderated testing
The pandemic forced remote research. Now we're realizing it's often better than in-person.
Why remote research wins:
- Faster turnaround times
- Global participant pool without visa requirements
- Users stay in their natural environment (no lab anxiety)
- Lower costs = more research budget for actual insights
New challenges to solve:
- Building rapport through screens
- Ensuring data privacy across countries
- Reading micro-expressions on Zoom calls
- Managing different time zones and tech setups
Research your way to better design decisions
Every design decision you make without user input is a gamble. Sometimes you'll get lucky. Often, you won't.
The best designers aren't the ones with the most creative ideas. They're the ones who consistently create solutions that real people actually want to use. And the only way to do that is by talking to those real people throughout your design process.
Start small. Pick one method from this guide and try it on your next project. Listen to what users tell you. Then iterate based on what you learn.
Your users (and your stakeholders) will thank you for it.
Whenever you're ready, there are 4 ways I can help you:
1. Junior Designer Bundle: Transition into UX and craft an unforgettable portfolio & get hired.
2. Senior Designer Bundle: Become a design leader with systems to build healthier, happier teams.
3. UX Portfolio Critique: In less than 48 hours, get your 30-minute personalised video of brutally honest feedback.
4. Job Sprint Course: Stand out in an unpredictable job market by building a memorable personal brand and a killer job search strategy.
